I think perhaps my expectations of A Dolls House were beyond
how good any show could be. Saying that I did enjoy the show, there were just a
few niggles and to be honest few of these were the fault of the production
itself. The audience were just very fidgety,
it’s a fairly long show but not ridiculous, and there was a particularly
fidgety school group sitting behind me, 14 year old boys find the strangest
things hilarious. Also, I was towards the back of the stalls, and throughout
the show there were the occasional bumps and audible talking taking place behind the doors by
what I presume was staff which in any theatre I think is pretty
unforgiveable.
My only criticism of the show itself, and something which I
think did affect the impact of the show on me, was that the use of the sound, like a distant rumble, which occurred whenever a cast member said something
significant and I felt was incredibly similar to the same effect in Sweet Bird
of Youth at The Old Vic this summer, which was a shame
Regardless of those minor points A Dolls House is a
fantastic production, as the reviews and it’s run at the Duke of York's Theatre prove! The story, of which I was completely new to,
is a mix of heart-breaking, angering and unfair. If I wasn’t a complete feminist on entering
the theatre, I am now. Some of the
phrases used by Torvald and the horror expressed at these by some outgoing audience members made me think about how we think we’ve come so far when in fact I’m not
sure we have. I know some peoples
wedding vows still state “to serve my husband”, not far from the script of this
play which caused horror in the theatre. I’m not alone in this, the
programme notes include an interview with Carrie Cracknell, the Director of
this production. She states that many women now think feminism has no need, we’ve
come so far in such recent history, yet she also states, “The idea of the woman
as a person who is perceived through how she looks, whose power is related to
how she looks, is more prevalent than it’s ever been – and that’s at the heart
of Ibsen’s play and Nora’s entrapment”.
Nora is repeatedly referred to by her husband as his “sparrow”, “dove”
and other birds which is initially amusing, until it becomes patronising and
degrading. I felt like shouting “YESS”
when Nora finally realises how her husband has treated her, as though she is
merely an object. It is by no means a happy ending, and apart from the applause
there is no other sign that this can be the end of Nora’s story, but I feel
that at least she stands up for herself in some respects, while also being
incredibly cruel abandoning her children and facing what little prospects a
single woman would have had in that period. I have to admit I had to keep on consciously
relaxing my face, I could feel myself frowning at the stage every time her
husband made some degrading little comment, which happened frequently.
(c) Johan Persson |
The set was also fantastic, as if it was a wooden dolls house with four rooms like most young girls have played with, the set would spin as cast moved around to each room, following them around the house which I particularly loved.
This was my first trip to the theatre on my own! A venture I
entered with some trepidation, but the show was great and I enjoyed being able
to absorb myself in the plot (as much as possible with the noisy kids behind
me) and thanks to social media I still had a good old natter about the show
after.
This trailer gives a good insight into the production!
The "use of the sound, like a distant rumble" was actually just a distant rumble. In both the Duke of York's and the Old Vic, what you hear are the tube trains travelling underneath the theatres.
ReplyDeleteOh I know you do hear tube trains clearly in many London theatres, particularly was bothered by it at Once. But this is definately a sound effect used in the theatre for dramatic effect - unless I've gone completley mad. Maybe distant rumble was the wrong expression, perhaps more of a ominous swell.
ReplyDelete