On Thursday evening I excitedly headed to the London
Palladium to see Lord of the Dance Dangerous Games. To give my excitement some
background I spent a few years of my childhood learning Irish Dance and
competed in a couple of Feis. I also saw Lord of the Dance at Wembley and met
the man himself, and apparently I’ve seen Riverdance although was too young to
remember. I’ll be going back to see
Riverdance this December.
So when I heard that a new Lord of the Dance show was coming
to London I couldn’t wait to see it. However, and it really upsets me to say it,
I just didn’t enjoy the show. It felt slightly cheap, gimmicky and too
provocative than is actually necessary.
Moments in the show where the dancers were all in unison and
wearing more traditional costumes were fantastic. Unfortunately these moments
were overshadowed by gimmicks that felt unnecessary. The set itself was very,
in a word, naff. It was made up of a
large screen at the back, which showed various mystical, futuristic scenes.
While I understand the idea it just didn’t come across well. The colour of the
stage floor itself was a beige/white colour and this made the whole set appear
slightly amateur, particularly for audience members sitting in the circle (as I
was). The costumes themselves also felt amateur, with a couple of noticeable mishaps in the show. All of these together just made the show feel a
bit unpolished.
I hate to be so disappointed with the show but just as I
tried to like it, something else took place that just put me off. At one moment
all the girls were dancing in dresses, beautiful soft shoe dances. However
suddenly the music changed and they stripped into just a bra and pants, to
leering comments from men behind me. I wouldn’t say I’m a prude but sexing the
show up like this was just completely unnecessary and also I felt quite sexist.
While the men were shirtless in the second half they were never presented in
such a provocative, and cheap, way. There was a big divide between men and women in this show which I don't think is necessary in 2014.
The idea of the show is a fight between good and evil, over
who will be crowned the Lord of the Dance. The narrative was lost at times, and
it tended to loose its way. I felt quite uncomfortable at one point when the
robotic evil characters were marching with the iconic Michael Flatley arm pose,
it was slightly too reminiscent of another recognisable march for comfort.
Nadine Coyle from Girls Aloud was also in the show, singing
a few power ballads. Although her voice surprised me (I hadn’t expected her to
be so good) it again just felt a bit gimmicky and didn’t really add anything to
the show. Although it did work well when she sang with male dancers in hard
shoes accompanying her. There were also two violinists who performed a few times, although obviously talented I hated the false grins and tiny tight dresses that took away from the music. All the other music in the show was pre-recorded. When there is a pit in the theatre it seems such a shame not to have a live band, that would have made a big difference to the show.
Just to put the cherry on the cake of a somewhat disappointing
evening, a large group of teenage tourists were sitting behind us and, without
sounding too much like an old woman, were so badly behaved! Talking all the way
through, kicking the backs of our seats, jeering at the stage. I lost my nerve
in the end and asked them to be quiet. Come interval time we moved to the other
side and the usher did say they had expected them to be trouble. To the credit
of the Palladium they did deal with it well although overhearing the amount of
complaints I think that the group should have been asked to leave. I think that the issue of tourists
seeing shows to tick it off their “to do in London” list needs to be addressed,
as a few shows I’ve seen have been spoilt by audience members who don’t really
want to be there. But that’s worth a whole other post!
Michael Flatley doesn’t appear until the end of the show,
and it was exciting to see him perform. Despite his success his arrogance felt
a little too prominent, particularly when we thought the show had ended and
then we had to watch three holograms of Michael dancing with himself – and then
another encore performance with the dancers. To be completely honest at that
point we’d just had enough.
I really wish I’d liked the show, it had potential but it
felt like money wasted on gimmicks could have been used to make a really
refined performance. Moments that caused the audience to go wild were when all
the dancers were in unison with their hard shoes. The surrounding gimmicks
weren’t really necessary. Sorry Michael, but I left feeling really quite disappointed.
Let’s hope my ticket to see Riverdance in December doesn’t leave such an
impression.
Hi Lily,
ReplyDeleteI went to the show in Nottingham last Saturday night and your post sums up my feelings about it perfectly! Tacky back-drop, incongruent costumes and robotic characters doing Irish dancing. I admired the athleticism of the dancers but the show was more like a school production...it seems that Michael Flatley's talents as a director fall short of his dancing by a considerable margin.
I'm glad it's not just me as I've heard other people rave about it!!
Delete